Background: Autologous connective tissue graft (CTG) is generally considered the gold standard for peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and root coverage therapy. The presence of epithelial remnants in CTG has been associated with complications after soft tissue augmentation surgery. However, a specific method for de-epithelization that is patently superior has not been identified yet. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two different approaches to de-epithelialize CTG samples harvested from the posterior palate.Methods: Patients in need of periodontal or implant-related surgery that required harvesting a CTG from the posterior palate region were recruited.CTG samples harvested with an indirect approach were de-epithelialized using either an intraoral (IO group) or an extraoral (EO group) method. Tissue specimens were subsequently processed for histological analysis. The presence or absence of oral epithelial remnants was determined by two examiners using light microscopy. Results: Twenty-four patients, who provided a total of 46 analyzable CTG samples, were enrolled in this study. Histological assessment revealed that 19 out of 22 samples in the IO group were free of epithelial remnants. In the EO group, 20

{"container_title":"Journal of Periodontology","first_page":652,"issns":["0022-3492","1943-3670"],"issue":"5","last_page":660,"publisher":"Wiley","volume":"94"}

Referenced by: doi:10.1002/jper.19-0715 doi:10.1002/jper.22-0167 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.007 doi:10.1002/jper.19-0716 doi:10.1111/jcpe.12185 doi:10.11607/prd.1929 doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2516-9 doi:10.1016/j.joms.2018.10.002 doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1974.tb01257.x doi:10.1902/jop.1985.56.12.715 doi:10.1902/jop.1992.63.5.477 doi:10.1002/cap.10124 doi:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00397.x doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01550.x doi:10.1111/jcpe.13452 doi:10.21608/adjc.2019.16223.1030 doi:10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.334 doi:10.1902/jop.2003.74.9.1376 doi:10.1111/jcpe.13413 doi:10.1902/jop.2007.070099 doi:10.1902/jop.1997.68.4.392 doi:10.1002/cap.10146 doi:10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.340 doi:10.11607/prd.3189 doi:10.1902/cap.2015.150020 doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4812571 doi:10.11607/prd.5035 doi:10.1016/s0278-2391(86)80017-9 doi:10.1136/bmj.i1152 doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2019.01.074 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 doi:10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.2 doi:10.11607/prd.3544 doi:10.11607/prd.5536 doi:10.1902/jop.2015.150346 doi:10.1902/jop.1973.44.12.727 doi:10.11607/prd.3587 doi:10.1089/photob.2019.4681 doi:10.21873/invivo.11851